 |
A NASA-selected panel of scientific representatives work closely with
the WFC3 Project to ensure that the instrument meets the expectations
of the general scientific community.
This Scientific Oversight Committee advise the WFC3 Project on all
major decisions regarding instrument capabilities and approve the
scientific tradeoffs during the instrument development process. A
balance must be achieved between capability and feasibility. Below
is a charter which lists the duties of the SOC.
| |||
WFC3 SOC Charter ||| |
| 1... |
define
the key scientific goals for WFC3, in particular,
define a representative set of scientific programs
to be used in the development of a Design Reference
Mission. |
|
| 2... |
define
the main scientific success criteria for WFC3, and
help determine the technical tradeoffs and assess
performance against these criteria. |
|
| 3... |
assist
in the prioritization of major operational modes.
|
|
| 4... |
participate
in the major project reviews. |
|
| 5... |
recommend
the set of filters to be incorporated in WFC3 for
the optimal execution of the scientific program (broad
community input will be sought as part of the SOC's
deliberations on this issue). |
|
| 6... |
participate
in the selection of the flight and spare detectors,
including the tradeoffs of the performance parameters
(QE, read-noise, cosmetics, etc.) and scientific objectives. |
|
|
Well over twenty distinguished scientists in the field of astronomy and
astrophysicists comprise the SOC. The members hail from universities,
institutes, and observatories across the world.
|